Friday, June 26, 2020
So the latest anti-mask argument making the rounds is: there's no point in wearing them because any suggestion that wearing masks reduces the transmission of certain airborne contagions is "not validated by any study." Which, so far as I know, is true (at least, I haven't looked for any). And here is something else not validated by any study: there has never, not once, been a scientifically rigorous double-blind study testing whether parachutes are effective at reducing fatalities among people who jump out of airplanes. There exists nary a single peer-reviewed study any pro-parachutists could link to, showing people with parachutes do any better than a parachute-free control group.
Clearly, then, the only logical, rational conclusion is that parachutes are worthless -- or, at most, are only useful for identifying the cowardly sheeple amongst the skydiving set, eh?
4 Comments:
I read a few Skeptics' blogs, and, actually, studies do show some effectiveness of masks. Neurological Blog, I think, is where I read this. There has also been a meta study of the studies performed so far. Sorry I don't have a link, but it should be easy to find.
Thanks! Unfortunately, it won't make a difference to the anti-maskers anyway.
I never imagined THIS would be the rock the "liberty" movement chose to wreck its ship on. I really didn't.
Just spotted your post. Here's an RCT study of influenza transmission within households, showing a 50% reduction in transmission for masks: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19193267/
Hi thaanks for sharing this
Post a Comment
<< Home